November 2022 - PC2023 - lists.digitalhumanities.org

Reassignement of reviews
by Anne Baillot 12 Dec '22

12 Dec '22

Dear PC members, first, thanks a lot to those of you who already did their reviews! A few submissions have been withdrawn so that we now are at 765 submissions in total. During today's meeting, we spotted a few more problematic cases (no upload, submission in German) and reassigned them to PC members. Also, due to review rejections, a series of submissions only had 2 or 3 reviewers left assigned. We have reassigned reviewers manually (based on topic convergence) so that all panels and long papers have at least 4 reviewers and the other types of proposals at least 3. Due to this reconfiguration, some of you now have a few additional reviews to tend to (staying within the limit you have indicated). We plan to send an e-mail to all reviewers on the 28th to remind them to check if they need to reject reviews (well... and not to forget to actually do the reviews), and to do a reviewer re-assignment round (if needed) on the 30th. All best, Anne, together with Toma and Walter -- Anne Baillot Professeure en Etudes Germaniques Faculté de Lettres, Langues et Sciences Humaines Département d'allemand Université du Mans Avenue Olivier Messiaen F-72085 LE MANS Cedex 9 CV et publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/annebaillot Sur twitter: @AnneBaillot

2 1

"Best Review Award" - great idea
by Laura Estill 28 Nov '22

28 Nov '22

Dear Ann and Toma, (and DH2023 PC) I just wanted to write to say that your reminder email for reviews hit just the right tone. Also, I love the idea of the “Best Review Award.” A fantastic way to recognize some often-overlooked yet critical academic labour. Thank you for your hard work, Laura Dr. Laura Estill Associate Professor of English St. Francis Xavier University Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Digital Humanities

1 0

Review Phase Open
by Anne Baillot 11 Nov '22

11 Nov '22

Dear Members of the Program Committee, we have finalized the first round of reviewer assignments, as you will have noticed with the e-mail you just received. We expect to receive a first batch of rejections in the coming days and will be reassigning these submissions on Wednesday. At this point, each submission has 4 reviews assigned. PC members have been attributed reviews manually - in some cases, because we have identified the submissions as problematic (no uploads, submissions in other languages,...). We have avoided assigning you too many reviews now in order to have more buffer to deal with the rejections on Wednesday. We will get back to you on Wednesday with an update! All best, Anne -- Anne Baillot Professeure en Etudes Germaniques Faculté de Lettres, Langues et Sciences Humaines Département d'allemand Université du Mans Avenue Olivier Messiaen F-72085 LE MANS Cedex 9 CV et publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/annebaillot Sur twitter: @AnneBaillot

1 0

Reviewing process: calendar
by Anne Baillot 07 Nov '22

07 Nov '22

Dear PC members, I am still in Graz where I had the opportunity to check on the conference venue - it is quite impressive and I look forward to meeting you all here in July! But before we can enjoy the conference, we have a few items on the to-do list... The reviewers will be assigned on Friday, November 11th (there are still a few details to finalize before we can get to it, like reviewers who haven't picked topics or people registered with several e-mail addresses...). The review period will last until December 15th. We are aiming at gathering 3 reviews for each short paper, poster or workshop and 4 reviews for each long paper or panel, that's 2595 reviews in total (to be written by 615 reviewers). It is very likely that we will miss a few of them when the review period is over. This means that for the PC the phase between *December 16th and December 22nd* will be particularly demanding since we will have to do all the missing reviews then, before opening the response phase. We just wanted to let you know this in advance so that you can get organized accordingly. We will get back to you to inform you on the progress of the reviewing process during the reviewing phase. All best, Anne -- Anne Baillot Professeure en Etudes Germaniques Faculté de Lettres, Langues et Sciences Humaines Département d'allemand Université du Mans Avenue Olivier Messiaen F-72085 LE MANS Cedex 9 CV et publications:https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/annebaillot Sur twitter: @AnneBaillot

2 1

DH2023 Submissions closed
by Scholger, Walter (walter.scholger＠uni-graz.at) 05 Nov '22

05 Nov '22

Dear members of the program committee, the submission period for DH2023 is over, and we got a total of 761 submissions: 160 posters 291 short presentations 234 long presentations 43 panels 33 workshops We are looking forward to a diverse and vibrant conference! Kind regards and have a nice weekend, Walter Walter Scholger Institutsmanager | Department Manager Zentrum für Informationsmodellierung | Centre for Information Modeling Universität Graz | University of Graz

1 0

Re: [Pc2023] SIG workshop proposal deadline
by Michael Eberle Sinatra 05 Nov '22

05 Nov '22

Dear all, since we are 16 hours from the deadline, I thought I’d check whether any SIGs took advantage of their pre-approved slot (whether session or workshop) with the information Glenn shared with the SIG conveners’ mailing list (ie to indicate they want to reserve something but with the info coming later). Best wishes, M. Michael E. Sinatra <https://www.michaelsinatra.org/> | Professeur titulaire et directeur Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur les humanités numériques (CRIHN <http://crihn.org/>) Responsable du Groupe de Recherche sur les Éditions critiques en contexte Numérique (GREN <https://gren.openum.ca/>) Responsable de l’option doctorale en Humanités numériques <https://llm.umontreal.ca/programmes-cours/humanites-numeriques/doctorat-en-…>, du microprogramme <https://admission.umontreal.ca/programmes/microprogramme-de-2e-cycle-en-hum…> et de la mineure <https://llm.umontreal.ca/programmes-cours/humanites-numeriques/mineure-en-h…> en HN, Université de Montréal > On Oct 27, 2022, at 4:09 PM, Layne-Worthey, Glen Cameron <gworthey(a)illinois.edu> wrote: > > Michael, Anne — > > Thanks for your notes in response to Andy’s question about the SIG deadline (and Michael, thank you for your request from earlier this week that we be in touch with the SIGs to inform them of this deadline). > > My understanding of the PC’s plan and of the Protocol that Michael quoted is this: any SIG that wants to reserve the guaranteed workshop or session slot should inform the PC by the November 4 deadline — but that actual proposals won’t be due until sometime December. Is that correct, and agreeable to everyone? > > We don’t actually have an official SIG liaison at the moment, and only just this afternoon restored our own access to the SIG Conveners’ mailing list — so a reminder can now be sent to the group of conveners (and we’ll be able to moderate it). We haven’t sent the reminder yet, but the address is SIG-conveners(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org <mailto:SIG-conveners@lists.digitalhumanities.org>. > > Anne, Toma — it seems best for that to come from the PC rather than the EB (we don’t want to be bossy!) — but if you’d like us to send it, please let us know. > > Thanks again for all your hard work! > > Glen > > >> On Oct 27, 2022, at 9:46 AM, Michael Eberle Sinatra <michael.eberle.sinatra(a)umontreal.ca> wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> just jumping in to remind everyone of the conference protocol section regarding SIGs and the conference: >> >> "SIG Proposals >> If they so choose, every SIG may organize one guaranteed pre-conference workshop or mini-conference OR one session for the conference program. These program elements are guaranteed acceptance. Each SIG may use whatever method it deems appropriate for organizing the session and providing peer review of its components. SIGs must notify the PC that they intend to organize a workshop or session prior to the conference submission deadline." >> >> So actually SIGs should be in touch with the PC before November 4th if they want to use their guaranteed workshop or session slot. I wrote Glen (EB chair) and Megan (EB secretary) earlier this week to remind them of that and they indicated they would be in touch with the SIG liaison on the COB shortly. >> >> Best wishes, >> Michael >> >> Michael E. Sinatra <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.micha…> | Professeur titulaire et directeur >> Centre de recherche interuniversitaire sur les humanités numériques (CRIHN <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcrihn.org%…>) >> Responsable du Groupe de Recherche sur les Éditions critiques en contexte Numérique (GREN <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgren.open…>) >> Responsable de l’option doctorale en Humanités numériques <https://llm.umontreal.ca/programmes-cours/humanites-numeriques/doctorat-en-…>, du microprogramme <https://admission.umontreal.ca/programmes/microprogramme-de-2e-cycle-en-hum…> et de la mineure <https://llm.umontreal.ca/programmes-cours/humanites-numeriques/mineure-en-h…> en HN, Université de Montréal >> >>> On Oct 27, 2022, at 2:21 AM, Anne Baillot <anne.baillot(a)univ-lemans.fr> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Andy, >>> it is absolutely correct and we have not communicated about it yet. The deadline should be around Mid-December, we are still working out the details so that it fits the conference general guidelines. We will send out e-mails (I am not completely sure yet but probably directly to SIG coordinators) soon. >>> Best, >>> Anne >>> >>> On 26/10/2022 17:14, Janco, Andrew Paul wrote: >>>> I have a question from Lauren Tilton: >>>> >>>> "do SIGs need to submit their workshop through the main process? In the past, it has been later and done separately, but I just wanted to make sure that I wasn’t missing a deadline." >>>> >>>> Is she correct that SIGs have their own workshop deadline? If so, when is that deadline? >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕨 𝕁𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕠 >>>> 𝔻𝕚𝕘𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕝 𝕊𝕔𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕡 ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕞𝕞𝕖𝕣 >>>> 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪 𝕠𝕗 ℙ𝕖𝕟𝕟𝕤𝕪𝕝𝕧𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕒 >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> PC2023 mailing list >>>> PC2023(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org <mailto:PC2023@lists.digitalhumanities.org> >>>> http://lists.lists.digitalhumanities.org/mailman/listinfo/pc2023 <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.list…> >>> -- >>> Anne Baillot >>> Professeure en Etudes Germaniques >>> Faculté de Lettres, Langues et Sciences Humaines >>> Département d'allemand >>> Université du Mans >>> Avenue Olivier Messiaen >>> F-72085 LE MANS Cedex 9 >>> >>> CV et publications: https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/annebaillot <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcv.archiv…> >>> Sur twitter: @AnneBaillot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PC2023 mailing list >>> PC2023(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org <mailto:PC2023@lists.digitalhumanities.org> >>> http://lists.lists.digitalhumanities.org/mailman/listinfo/pc2023 <https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.list…> >> _______________________________________________ >> PC2023 mailing list >> PC2023(a)lists.digitalhumanities.org >> http://lists.lists.digitalhumanities.org/mailman/listinfo/pc2023 > > > > -- > Glen Layne-Worthey > Associate Director for Research Support Services, HathiTrust Research Center > School of Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign > Executive Board Chair, Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO) > gworthey(a)illinois.edu | 650-213-6759 > > > >

2 1

(no subject)
by Janco, Andrew Paul 02 Nov '22

02 Nov '22

Dear PC colleagues, More questions: 1. CFP on dh2023.adho.org * In the CFP it says, “Does the submission meet all formal criteria (abstract length, citation style, formatting etc.)?” * I couldn’t find anywhere where it says something about “citation style, formatting, etc”. 1. Conftool * In ConfTools, it says for a Short Presentation, “Please note that the additional 100 words of the maximum length of the abstract is intended for bibliography only”. But, on 2023 website and in ConfTools, it says that the proposal should be 500-750 words. * So, is the proposal supposed to be 600 words? Or 750 and then there is another 100 words for a bibliography? Best, Andy 𝔸𝕟𝕕𝕣𝕖𝕨 𝕁𝕒𝕟𝕔𝕠 𝔻𝕚𝕘𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕝 𝕊𝕔𝕙𝕠𝕝𝕒𝕣𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕡 ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕘𝕣𝕒𝕞𝕞𝕖𝕣 𝕌𝕟𝕚𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕪 𝕠𝕗 ℙ𝕖𝕟𝕟𝕤𝕪𝕝𝕧𝕒𝕟𝕚𝕒

2 1