[Humanist] 32.11 Humanist at 31
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Sat May 12 09:23:13 CEST 2018
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 11.
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 18:13:20 +0200
From: Manfred Thaller <manfred.thaller at uni-koeln.de>
Subject: Re: 32.8 humanist at 31
In-Reply-To: <20180510085652.997BB11EC at s16382816.onlinehome-server.info>
well, first of all, after 31 years one might wonder, whether you should
not adopt the motto of the Prince of Wales. (This is not supposed in any
way to imply a loss of eyesight by anybody involved.) Thanks, in other
> that the perceptible
> decline in the number of postings,
Hm. I, myself, have posted very rarely, so I am not in a position to
complain. But I watch quite a few of the competing channels, and I
notice a similar phenomenon on all of them. I'm really considering to
cancel a few subscriptions to lists, as I seem to get the same
announcements on many of them - and there is at least one quite active
"blog", a much more modern medium, that is, which shares exactly the
problem of many announcements and few (almost no) opinions. Could it be,
that expressing an opinion has become fraught with dangers, at least
No diagnosis - just: I may unsubscribe from quite a few of these other
resources, I will not from Humanist.
Am 10.05.2018 um 10:56 schrieb Humanist Discussion Group:
> Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 32, No. 8.
> Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
> Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 09:26:18 +0100
> From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk>
> Subject: forgotten 31st birthday
> Dear colleagues,
> Perhaps no one noticed Humanist's 31st birthday slip by, three days ago.
> I didn't. And that leads me to wonder whether my failure to remember,
> indeed prepare for it by beginning a celebratory note ahead of time, has
> any significance beyond the personal. (No medicalisation, please!) All
> the usual excuses of a busy life stand ready to be deployed, but I'll
> leave them alone. The fact that the competitors for your professional
> attention are now themselves years old suggests that the perceptible
> decline in the number of postings, a tempting measure of attention
> drifting elsewhere, isn't due simply to them. I'll also leave untouched
> speculations based on the state of national and international political
> discourse, though I cannot help but wonder if my own frequent avoidance
> of the news that is seldom new is an indicator of something much larger.
> On the one hand, it is difficult to imagine a more exciting time
> intellectually, and never a time when more has been available across the
> disciplines. In a field which interpenetrates all others -- here we are
> -- there's never a lack of things to discuss and reasons for discussing
> them. On the other hand...
> That's where your comments and observations are needed. If, that is,
> your reception of Humanist has not been stopped by malfunctioning
> software, still under investigation.
Prof. em. Dr. Manfred Thaller
Zuletzt Universität zu Köln /
Formerly University at Cologne
More information about the Humanist