[Humanist] 31.57 microfilm to digital
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Fri May 26 07:47:02 CEST 2017
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 31, No. 57.
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
[1] From: Natalie Harrower <N.Harrower at ria.ie> (32)
Subject: Re: 31.49 microfilm to digital?
[2] From: Enrico Pasini <epasini at unito.it> (11)
Subject: Re: 31.52 microfilm to digital
--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 10:55:49 +0000
From: Natalie Harrower <N.Harrower at ria.ie>
Subject: Re: 31.49 microfilm to digital?
In-Reply-To: <20170524045944.64836185A at digitalhumanities.org>
Good advice coming through via ways to keep costs down. There is also a lot of information available on best practices, which is particularly useful if you are doing it yourself.
See this list from the Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/ndnp/guidelines/digitizing.html
And we also have a list on of resources on our website: http://dri.ie/digitisation-resources-0
Good luck,
Natalie
_________________
Dr. Natalie Harrower | Director, Digital Repository of Ireland
Royal Irish Academy | 19 Dawson St. Dublin 2
n.harrower at ria.ie<mailto:n.harrower at ria.ie> | @natalieharrower | @dri_ireland | www.dri.ie http://www.dri.ie
On 24 May 2017, at 05:59, Humanist Discussion Group
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 31, No. 49.
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
> Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:40:38 +0000
> From: Richard Cunningham <richard.cunningham at acadiau.ca>
> Subject: microfilm conversion methods sought
Dear Humanists,
A colleague of mine is wondering if anyone can suggest an inexpensive way to convert microfilm to a digital format. The microfilm is held at a small African university library that lacks funding, so inexpensive is a key term.
All suggestions will be gratefully received.
Thanks,
Richard
Richard Cunningham
Department of English and Theatre
Acadia University
--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 13:04:00 +0200
From: Enrico Pasini <epasini at unito.it>
Subject: Re: 31.52 microfilm to digital
In-Reply-To: <20170525050707.B50EE1B46 at digitalhumanities.org>
On 25 May 2017, at 07:07, Humanist Discussion Group
> [1] From: maurizio lana <maurizio.lana at gmail.com> (25)
> this said, the number of images per microfilm and the quality needed in the
> conversion from analog to digital are relevant to envisage the best possible
If:
1. only "readable" quality required,
2. working microfilm *viewer* available,
a labour-intensive but rather inexpensive solution is to photograph the enlarged image on the viewer with a suitable camera, even a good phone. Image post-processing might be required.
See the slightly more sophisticated setting at http://thefamilycurator.com/microfilm-to-megapixels-use-a-digital-camera-as-a-film-scann/
Ciao,
ep
More information about the Humanist
mailing list