[Humanist] 28.869 an argument & belief system

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Tue Apr 7 07:19:13 CEST 2015


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 28, No. 869.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2015 09:36:22 -0400
        From: drwender at aol.com
        Subject: Re:  28.860 an argument & belief system
        In-Reply-To: <20150403080750.29313E32 at digitalhumanities.org>


Some efforts formalizing scholarly interpretations of lyrics (and other literary texts) you'll find as soon as 1976. Cf.

Meggle, Georg / Manfred Beetz 1976: Interpretationstheorie und Interpretationspraxis. Kronberg/Ts. (Wissenschaftstheorie und Grundlagenforschung 3)

If such efforts tend to fail analyzing extant interpretations that's not the analyzer's fault, but caused by the lack of interpreter's rationality, isn't it?

Apart from the example requested by Martin and Desmond I'm very interested in a debate detailing the cons against the use of an argument? & belief system to model scholarly literary communications.

Greetings, Herbert






More information about the Humanist mailing list