[Humanist] 28.184 on collaborative writing

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Mon Jul 7 04:15:39 CEST 2014


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 28, No. 184.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:06:27 +1000
        From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk>
        Subject: on collaborative writing

Those here who collaborate or are only interested in the subject of 
collaboration will be interested in the CRASSH blog posting by Joe 
Parent and Joe Uscinski for 19 June, "Of Coauthoring" 
(http://www.crassh.cam.ac.uk/blog/post/of-coauthoring). These co-authors 
note six "things that worked for us--many of which worked for us after 
not doing them definitely didn't work":

1. Ground rules first ("nailing down how the labor and credit will be 
split")
2. Things fall apart (projects tend to get out of hand; life intervenes)
3. It's not about you (managing relationships is the key to success)
4. Trust your partner ("Coauthors come together because they're 
complements")
5. The infinite veto ("authors can block any material they're 
uncomfortable with")
6. Don't track changes ("the track changes function... bears the cloven 
stamp of Satan")

Comments? How much of this applies to collaborative project
work?

Yours,
WM
-- 
Willard McCarty (www.mccarty.org.uk/), Professor, Department of Digital
Humanities, King's College London, and Research Group in Digital
Humanities, University of Western Sydney




More information about the Humanist mailing list