[Humanist] 25.503 events: museums; AI; law & ethics
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Tue Nov 22 09:54:35 CET 2011
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 25, No. 503.
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
 From: Maria Botti <botti at otenet.gr> (15)
Subject: cfp: 5th International Conference on Information law and
 From: Bernd Carsten Stahl <bstahl at dmu.ac.uk> (62)
Subject: cfp: Symposium on a Framework for Responsible Research and
Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
 From: "Tanner, Simon" <simon.tanner at kcl.ac.uk> (12)
Subject: Digital Humanities Scholars in Museums - MCN 2011 Panel
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:53:20 +0000
From: Maria Botti <botti at otenet.gr>
Subject: cfp: 5th International Conference on Information law and ethics 2012
CALL FOR PAPERS
5th International Conference on Information Law and Ethics 2012 Equity, Integrity & Beauty in Information Law & Ethics
Corfu, June 29-30, 2012
Conference website: http://conferences.ionio.gr/icil2012
The ICIL conference is open to papers on any field of law and/or ethics related in any way to any aspect of information. Papers of philosophy, sociology, history and psychology of information also interest us. We are interested in papers on intellectual property, data protection, freedom of information, individual rights and information, privacy, cyberlaw and cyberethics, media law and ethics, digital divide and information technology, e-government, surveillance, intellectual freedom, open access, digital divide and other. We are also particularly interested in papers on the historical development of information laws and ethical theory and we would also consider papers dealing with the social, political or psychological aspects of information.
Special sessions of ICIL 2012-please submit abstracts mentioning the session you prefer. See details of these sessions in the ICIL site.
Arts and Ethics http://conferences.ionio.gr/icil2012/art-ethics
Women in Academia http://conferences.ionio.gr/icil2012/women
Young Scholars’ Forum<http://conferences.ionio.gr/icil2012/young-scholars>
Libraries’ Intellectual Capital<http://conferences.ionio.gr/icil2012/libraries>
Submitted abstracts of 250 words (references excluded) should be sent for review to botti at otenet.gr<mailto:botti at otenet.gr>
Abstracts deadline: March 15, 2012
Notification on acceptance of abstracts: April 1, 2012
Full paper deadline: June 1, 2012
IMPORTANT NOTICE We have opened the paper reviewing process; interested researchers will be informed about the review of their paper within 15 days from receipt of their abstract.
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 08:53:42 +0000
From: Bernd Carsten Stahl <bstahl at dmu.ac.uk>
Subject: cfp: Symposium on a Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
Symposium on a Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation in Artificial Intelligence
Call for Papers
In recognition of the Turing Centenary, the society for the study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB) will be holding a joint meeting with the International Association of Computing and Philosophy (IACAP): 2-6 July 2012 in Birmingham, UK.
*** Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation of Behaviour (AISB) http://www.aisb.org.uk/
*** International Association for Computing and Philosophy (IACAP)
As part of this event, the UK EPSRC funded project on a Framework for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT will host a symposium targeted at issues of responsibility specific to AI. This symposium is foreseen to take place on Wednesday 04 and Thursday 05 July 2012. For an updated version of the call for papers please check:
Despite the plethora of ethical issues related to or arising from artificial intelligence, there is little guidance on what it would mean to undertake research in the area in a responsible way. Ethical issues that are currently being discussed include whether and under what conditions artificial agents are capable of being moral subjects, which rights or obligations they have or should have or how moral codes and ethical theories will have to change in the light of potentially autonomous artificial intelligence, to name but a few. In the light of these highly interesting and very complex questions, researchers interested in ethics and AI have tended to pay much less attention to the types of responsibility issues research on AI may raise and how they can be addressed.
Important questions that need to be answered are: how ethical issues can be identified in the first place, who is responsible for addressing them, to whom they are responsible, what the consequences are of such responsibility and which roles the different stakeholders play in the ensuing network of responsibility. In addition, it is unclear to what degree recent attempts to promote responsible research and innovation in other disciplines (Kjolberg & Strand, 2011; Owen & Goldberg, 2010) are pertinent to ICT and AI. Similarly, it remains unclear whether generic attempts to provide guidance on ethics in ICT (Harris, Jennings, Pullinger, Rogerson, & Duquenoy, 2011; Wright, 2011) are appropriate for the types of problems to be discussed in AI. The principles of robotics published by the EPSRC include guidance for designers, builders and users of robots. It is currently not clear how these principles have been applied in practice and in what way they can facilitate a responsible approach to AI.
The proposed symposium will draw on work undertaken in two important research projects. The first is the European FP7 research project ETICA (Ethical Issues of Emerging ICT Applications, www.etica-project.eu<http://www.etica-project.eu>), which has identified particular ethical issues that can be expected to arise from AI in the medium-term future. The second is the UK EPSRC project on a “Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT” which aims to provide a community-owned account of responsibility within the ICT area. AI presents core research questions for both of these projects which motivates the proposal for this workshop specifically on responsible innovation in AI.
A key incentive of this symposium is to foster discourse between philosophers & social scientists who are interested in computer ethics and AI researchers & practitioners who are fluent in the processes and practices of AI. Providing governance arrangements that give suitable attention to the ethics of AI will require an equal and overarching understanding of both of these aspects.
The symposium will therefore aim to specifically attract case studies and comparable accounts of ethical issues of AI. It will solicit contributions on the identification of such issues, their resolution, their context and the way in which such experiences are of broader interest. It is envisaged that the symposium will be highly interactive to allow space for the discovery of so far underdeveloped areas in need of research aimed at understanding ethical issues in AI.
A further outcome of the symposium will be the development of case studies to be shared among the community. The EPSRC project has set itself the task of developing an Observatory for Responsible Research and Innovation in ICT which will be a community-owned resource fostering increased understanding and discussion of pertinent issues. The project has a significant budget to be allocated to AI researchers interested in carrying out case studies that focus on ethical issues encountered in the design and development of such systems. The proposed symposium will contribute to identifying interested AI researchers who may want to participate in carrying out case studies.
Plenary speakers are likely to include: (a final and confirmed list will be available on http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/turing12/invited.php):
· Monday: Colin Allen
· Tuesday: Stephen Wolfram
· Wednesday: Luciano Floridi
· Thursday: (to be determined)
· Friday: Aaron Sloman
Submissions will be invited on topics such as:
· Responsibilities of the individual researcher / developer in AI
· Collective responsibility in AI; how is it defined and enforced?
· Unforeseen consequences and side effects in AI: how can they be addressed?
· Limitations of responsibility in AI
· Responsibility, liability and accountability: is the legal framework for AI sufficient?
· Responsibility and relativism: how can responsibilities be defined in a context of cultural and disciplinary pluralism?
Submissions / Timeline
Submission of extended abstracts (up to 1500 words) will be invited.
Submissions should be sent by email to bstahl at dmu.ac.uk<mailto:bstahl at dmu.ac.uk>
· submissions should be in by 1 February 2012
· acceptance/rejection decisions will be made by 1 March 2012
· final versions of abstracts, papers, etc. (as appropriate for your symposium), for inclusion in proceedings, delivered by authors to the symposium chairs by 30 March 2012.
· Marina Jirotka, University of Oxford, e-Research Centre
· Bernd Carsten Stahl, De Montfort University, Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility
· Grace Eden, University of Oxford, e-Research Centre
Programme Committee (to be confirmed)
· Philippe Goujon, University of Namur
· Don Gotterbarn, East Tennessee State University
· Terry Bynum, Southern Connecticut State University
· Veikko Ikonen, VTT, Finland
· Michael Nagenborg, University of Tübingen, Germany
· Mathias Gutmann, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany
Authors interested in the ethics of doing AI research are encouraged to check the conference website for two other symposia as possible venues for submitting their research: (1) Moral Cognition and Theory of Mind, and (2) The Machine Question: AI, Ethics, and Moral Responsibility.
The Congress serves both as the year's AISB Convention and the year's IACAP conference. The Congress has been inspired by a desire to honour Alan Turing, and by the broad and deep significance of Turing's work to AI, to the philosophical ramifications of computing, and to philosophy and computing more generally. The Congress is one of the events forming the Alan Turing Year (http://www.mathcomp.leeds.ac.uk/turing2012/).
The intent of the Congress is to stimulate a particularly rich interchange between AI and Philosophy on any areas of mutual interest, whether directly addressing Turing's own research output or not.
The Congress will consist mainly of a number of collocated Symposia on specific research areas, interspersed with Congress-wide refreshment breaks, social events and invited Plenary Talks. All papers other than the invited Plenaries will be given within Symposia.
Harris, I., Jennings, R. C., Pullinger, D., Rogerson, S., & Duquenoy, P. (2011). Ethical assessment of new technologies: a meta-methodology. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9(1), 49-64. doi:10.1108/14779961111123223
Kjolberg, K. L., & Strand, R. (2011). Conversations About Responsible Nanoresearch. NanoEthics, 1–15.
Owen, R., & Goldberg, N. (2010). Responsible Innovation: A Pilot Study with the U.K. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(11), 1699-1707. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01517.x
Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessmentof information technology. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(online first). Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/1388-1957/preprint/?sort=p_OnlineDate&sortorder=desc&o=10
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:43:48 +0000
From: "Tanner, Simon" <simon.tanner at kcl.ac.uk>
Subject: Digital Humanities Scholars in Museums - MCN 2011 Panel
In-Reply-To: <9C34D44D56EE92439E316D60B8493FC514F02A1C5D at KCL-MAIL04.kclad.ds.kcl.ac.uk>
Digital Humanities Scholars in Museums - MCN 2011 Panel
This Youtube playlist hosts Neal Stimler's Museum Computer Network 2011 crowd sourced YouTube video panel, "Philosophical Leadership Needed for the Future: Digital Humanities Scholars in Museums." Panellists submitted responses from an open call to the community of professionals in archives, libraries, museums and universities as they reflected on the barriers and benefits of implementing digital humanities methodologies in museums. View the conference webpage for more information http://www.mcn.edu/2011/philosophical-leadership-needed-future-digital-humanities-scholars-museums
I submitted a short video and many others submitted interesting and innovative views of DH in museums. Well worth a browse.
I attended via Twitter and panellists answered questions there. The Twitter feed can be explored by searching #mcn2011 and/or #digitalhumanities.
All my best,
Simon Tanner King's College London
Tel: +44 (0)7887 691716
More information about the Humanist