[Humanist] 25.50 cfp: commentary on leaks

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Fri May 27 00:55:32 CEST 2011

                  Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 25, No. 50.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org

        Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:39:41 +0100
        From: Jacob Johanssen <jacob at cyborgsubjects.org>
        Subject: CFP Reminder Wikileaks: Journalism, Politics and Ethics

Just a quick reminder of the call for papers below. Thanks!

In 2010, WikiLeaks released U.S. embassy diplomatic cables (creating what
some already refer to as the ‘Cablegate’ affair), as well as classified
reports and top secret footage extracted from the wars in Afghanistan and
Iraq. These unprecedented developments ignited a lively international debate
involving politicians, journalists and members of the public, raising
questions and concerns about Wikileaks’ short and long term political,
legal, ethical and logistical effects. On the one hand, Wikileaks shocked
the international diplomatic community and brought up issues of national
security and censorship. Simultaneously, media experts started exploring
what Wikileaks might mean for (the future of) journalism and how it might
change the role of the Internet in news reporting. Wikileaks also brought to
the table issues concerning the boundaries of digital journalism and raised
questions about how news reporting is done in an age of digital
communications, particularly in what the functions of ‘whistleblowers’ and
online leaks are concerned.

Cyborg Subjects (www.cyborgsubjects.org) takes great pleasure and active
interest in placing these issues at the core of its next project. We invite
all interested authors to send full-length articles (3000 words maximum),
short commentaries (500-800 words), interviews or book reviews (1000-1500
words) to submissions at cyborgsubjects.org

. Artworks, Videos, Performances, etc. related to the topic are also very
welcome. Contributions may wish to report, comment on or review theoretical and
empirical insights into topics such as the following (and beyond):

•What is the relationship between the most recent Wikileaks and the recent
uprisings in the Arab world?
•Why has Wikileaks provoked such a huge amount of controversy and
international reaction?
• What are the main legal and ethical issues raised by Wikileaks?
•Wikileaks: freedom of speech and the right to information. Where is the
line drawn? Does this line even exist?
• Wikileaks: privacy, online data protection and national security.
• What are the implications of Wikileaks for the study and conceptualizing
of new media journalism and political communication?
• Is Wikileaks a journalistic organization?
• Can Wikileaks be considered investigative journalism?
• How does Wikileaks challenge traditional journalistic standards?
• What type of media activism is served by Wikileaks?
• What is the role of ‘whistleblowers’ in Wikileaks (e.g. the case of
Bradley Manning)?
• What are the policy implications of the extrajudicial tactics deployed to
censor Wikileaks?
• What does the collaboration between WikiLeaks and traditional newspapers
have to say about the future of mass media technologies?
• How is Wikileaks’ editor in chief, Julian Assange, significant as a public
figure? How, and by whom is he being ‘sanctified’ or ‘demonized’?
• What is significant (feminist, post-feminist and/or non-feminist
discussions welcome) about Julian Assange's accusations of rape, in the
midst of the WikiLeaks international scandal?
• How can researchers (ethically) deal with data published by WikiLeaks?
• How ‘unexpected’ were the insights revealed by Wikileaks? Do they defy, or
merely confirm public expectations of what goes on behind political façades?

We invite all those interested to send their full contribution (including a
150-200 word abstract) to submissions at cyborgsubjects.org, by June 6, 2011.
Contributors are free to use any reference style systems (e.g., APA, Harvard
etc), as long as they are consistent in how they cite their sources
throughout the article, and use endnotes, rather than footnotes, for

Cyborg Subjects offers a radical and new review system. We believe that
knowledge should be free and that the process of knowledge production should
not be obfuscated by the less transparent, “knowledge is power” peer review
system associated with traditional academic journals. Therefore, submitted
articles will be published as they come in and reviews will be posted as
comments. Authors are asked to engage in the ensuing discussion and to
comment on the review, as well as on other individuals’ (potential)
reactions to the article.

Feel free to visit www.cyborgsubjects.org to find out more! You can also
find us on Facebook (http://fb.com/cyborgsubjects) and Twitter (

More information about the Humanist mailing list