Dear Anne, Toma, and PC, I see in the CFP that there is a mention of “citation style”; and I see in the recent reminder email (thank you—and nicely done!) that accepted papers will be submitting “camera-ready” copies, but I can’t seem to find a style guide or stated citation style anywhere. Given that the ADHO journals all use different citation styles (DHQ, DSH, DSCN, etc), and expectations vary by region or (sub)discipline, I didn’t want to make any assumptions. Is there a recommended citation style for the conference? (For DH2020 we cited “A short note on pointless reference formatting<https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.44.3.006>” for the book of abstracts—but each year gets to choose how they proceed with references.) Thanks again, Anne and Toma, for all of your hard work. Laura Dr. Laura Estill Associate Professor of English St. Francis Xavier University Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Digital Humanities
That's a good question, Laura. I don't have a ready answer, I have to say we haven't discussed it yet, but Anne, Walter and I are meeting on Monday again and we'll add this question to the agenda. So we'll get back to you — and the entire world :) — next week. Thanks for raising this issue! All best, Toma -- Belgrade Center for Digital Humanities http://humanistika.org
11.01.2023, в 04:19, Laura Estill <[email protected]> написал(а):
Dear Anne, Toma, and PC,
I see in the CFP that there is a mention of “citation style”; and I see in the recent reminder email (thank you—and nicely done!) that accepted papers will be submitting “camera-ready” copies, but I can’t seem to find a style guide or stated citation style anywhere. Given that the ADHO journals all use different citation styles (DHQ, DSH, DSCN, etc), and expectations vary by region or (sub)discipline, I didn’t want to make any assumptions. Is there a recommended citation style for the conference?
(For DH2020 we cited “A short note on pointless reference formatting <https://utpjournals.press/doi/10.3138/jsp.44.3.006>” for the book of abstracts—but each year gets to choose how they proceed with references.)
Thanks again, Anne and Toma, for all of your hard work. Laura
Dr. Laura Estill Associate Professor of English St. Francis Xavier University Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Digital Humanities
_______________________________________________ PC2023 mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.lists.digitalhumanities.org/mailman/listinfo/pc2023
Dear CCC and PC members, Thank you very much for your support over the past weeks (especially during the holidays!). At this point, the reviewers have already been actively engaging in re-evaluating the submissions based on the authors’ responses so that everything is running according to plan. A really hot phase for the PC will begin in February with the discussion of the program. One of the reasons why the finalization of the program might be rather tricky is that a lot of submissions have received very different grades so that the range between the grades for the same submission often exceeds 20 points and can go up to 60 points. Maybe in the current adjustment phase the gap will be reduced, but we will still have some pondering to do in the end. That being said, Walter was kind enough to sum up the first projections in terms of how many parallel sessions we could accommodate. In terms of space, we are quite free. The Messe (i.e. the Graz Congress Center) provides room for more parallel sessions than we would actually like to have. One particularly nice feature of the location is that it has a very large room located between two sections of the Messe - some kind of corridor if you want -, with glass walls, that would be extremely suitable to display posters and would allow for the posters to remain there during the whole conference, which we think would be really nice. In the following googlesheet, you can find: * The number of presentations that can be delivered, depending on the number of parallel tracks (each cell presents two options: long papers and short papers) * The percentage of acceptance to which this corresponds for each submission track * A tentative program (which we also would have to discuss even though this is less urgent) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NNlnffSBvl-prg1RhslRPwVx8saUAm7lNXS5... <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NNlnffSBvl-prg1RhslRPwVx8saUAm7lNXS5zMrss_k/edit?usp=sharing> For instance, Cell D2 means that in the case of 5 parallel tracks, we can accommodate in the corresponding slots 20 long papers or 60 short papers for an acceptance rate around 25%. The idea of these projections is to give us a sense of the type of selection we are going to have to engage in when preparing the program. Toma and I would like to stay below 8 parallel tracks at this point, allowing for a better overview of the program, but we would be grateful for any feedback from you and will do our best to incorporate your input in the next phase. All best, Anne and Toma -- Anne Baillot Professeure en Etudes Germaniques Faculté de Lettres, Langues et Sciences Humaines Département d'allemand Université du Mans Avenue Olivier Messiaen F-72085 LE MANS Cedex 9 CV et publications:https://cv.archives-ouvertes.fr/annebaillot Sur twitter: @AnneBaillot
participants (3)
-
Anne Baillot -
Laura Estill -
Toma Tasovac