[Humanist] 31.765 surveys, ideology, infrastructure, service
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Thu Apr 12 09:18:58 CEST 2018
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 31, No. 765.
Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 08:33:49 +0200
From: Manfred Thaller <manfred.thaller at uni-koeln.de>
Subject: Re: 31.761 surveys, ideology, infrastructure, service
In-Reply-To: <20180411075033.EFF859D6C at s16382816.onlinehome-server.info>
well - I do understand your concern, very well so.
But I am afraid, you ask the wrong question.
It presupposes a knowledge of what the Digital Humanities actually are.
And my experience has been that whensoever anybody raises that question,
the immediate reaction of at least one person in the audience, usually
applauded by a significant fraction, is that the "Digital Humanities are
not about defining, but about doing". This of course carries the
convenient implication that, whatsoever the speaker is doing, IS part of
the Digital Humanities. Or, possibly, not part, but the essence of it.
As long as this is so, you cannot react intellectually to the pure
political wish to create reasons, why you should be funded for waving
Am 11.04.2018 um 09:50 schrieb Humanist Discussion Group:
> Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 31, No. 761.
> Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
> Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:07:55 +0000
> From: Joris van Zundert <joris.van.zundert at huygens.knaw.nl>
> Subject: Re: 31.756 survey: trust in DH, confidence in services and infrastructures
> In-Reply-To: <20180410075832.9B6E5898E at s16382816.onlinehome-server.info>
> Dear all,
> To "strengthen the sustainability of digital humanities" is to "increase
> confidence in DH services and infrastructures". I think that is rich, and
> an ideological push in an unhelpful direction.
> I guess those of you who know me, will not be surprised that the invitation
> in Humanist 31.576 raises at least my eyebrows. I would like to invite the
> opinion of the DH community (in so far at least as represented by Humanist)
> on this one. I feel there are quite a lot of surveys lately, so I feel a
> little weary about them anyway and wonder how representative they are in
> But especially the matter with this invitation is aggravated in that DH yet
> again is strongly equated with infrastructure and service (and DARIAH it
> seems). All of which I think may very well be part of DH, but far from in
> some Ã¢ÂÂ£ manner. (That's a formal logic sign for 'strictly equivalent to', if
> you were wondering.)
> Obviously everybody should be free to make up his own mind about
> participating in a survey. But my question: wouldn't it be better to
> actively oppose such strongly ideologically colored surveys?
> All best
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 at 09:58, Humanist Discussion Group <
> willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk> wrote:
>> Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 31, No. 756.
>> Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
>> Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
>> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 17:40:03 +0100
>> From: RosÃÂ¡rio_Jorge <mrosariogj at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Digital Humanities Survey
>> Dear Sir / Madam
>> NOVA University (Lisbon, Portugal) is leading the implementation of a
>> survey addressed to users and potential users of digital humanities. This
>> survey integrates an European Commission project - DESIR
>> (INFRADEV-03-2016-2017). The survey aims to assess current trust in DH and
>> to propose strategies and actions in order to increase confidence in
>> services and infrastructures. The success of this activity requires a high
>> number of responses by DH users and potential users.
>> In this regard, we kindly ask for your support to disseminate the survey
>> among all professors, researchers and graduated students from your
>> institution and from other European Union institutions, using the text and
>> link below.
>> We thank you very much in advance for your important support.
>> Best regards,
>> Maria do RosÃÂ¡rio Jorge
>> (DESIR Researcher)
Prof. em. Dr. Manfred Thaller
Zuletzt UniversitÃÂ¤t zu KÃÂ¶ln /
Formerly University at Cologne
More information about the Humanist