[Humanist] 30.165 methods?

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Wed Jul 13 08:01:12 CEST 2016


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 30, No. 165.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:04:56 -0500
        From: Laura Mandell <laura.mandell at gmail.com>
        Subject: Public and Digital Humanities


I have been writing a syllabus for faculty meetings, proposing that people
from various humanities fields meet together in order to figure out what
methodologies are common to humanities disciplines. The goal is twofold: to
figure out ways to make those methods public and so usable by educated
people who are interested, and to test digital methods in relation to
humanities methods. Do digital methods enhance humanistic methods? Advance
them? Impede?

I hoping that the readers of Humanist, especially those now attending
DH2016, might be willing to help revise the digital methods sections,
especially, although I welcome any feedback on all parts of the syllabus.

The syllabus is available via MLA Commons: http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/M68P5D
Thank you in advance if you have time to help.

Sincerely,
Laura Mandell

-- 
Laura Mandell
Director, Initiative for Digital Humanities, Media, and Culture
Professor, English
Texas A&M University
p: 979-845-8345
e: idhmc at tamu.edu
@mandellc
http://idhmc.tamu.edu





More information about the Humanist mailing list