[Humanist] 27.749 corpus representativeness; chronology of concordancing

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Tue Jan 28 07:32:09 CET 2014


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 27, No. 749.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org

  [1]   From:    AMELIA DEL ROSARIO SANZ CABRERIZO <amsanz at filol.ucm.es>   (34)
        Subject: Re:  27.744 chronology of concordancing in images

  [2]   From:    Heather Froehlich <heather.froehlich at strath.ac.uk>        (10)
        Subject: testing how representative a particular corpus is


--[1]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:09:27 +0100
        From: AMELIA DEL ROSARIO SANZ CABRERIZO <amsanz at filol.ucm.es>
        Subject: Re:  27.744 chronology of concordancing in images
        In-Reply-To: <20140127084709.EEA7E61ED at digitalhumanities.org>


Please, don't forget :

Textométrie. TXM:
http://textometrie.ens-lyon.fr/?lang=fr

Amelia Sanz
Complutense University (MAdrid, Spain)

2014-01-27 Humanist Discussion Group <willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk>

>                  Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 27, No. 744.
>             Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
>                        www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
>                 Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
>
>
>
>         Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:25:25 -0600
>         From: "Robert A. Amsler" <amsler at cs.utexas.edu>
>         Subject: [  Longman Mini-Concordancer screenshot]
>
>
> This interactive history of concordance software might interest Humanist
> readers.
>
>
> http://timemapper.okfnlabs.org/muranava/history-of-computerised-corpus-tools
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> List posts to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
> List info and archives at at: http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist
> Listmember interface at:
> http://digitalhumanities.org/humanist/Restricted/listmember_interface.php
> Subscribe at:
> http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/membership_form.php
>



--[2]------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:26:18 +0000
        From: Heather Froehlich <heather.froehlich at strath.ac.uk>
        Subject: testing how representative a particular corpus is
        In-Reply-To: <20140127084709.EEA7E61ED at digitalhumanities.org>

Corpora-L, a highly complementary listserv to the Humanist list, has been having a lively discussion about ways to address testing corpus representativeness. I suspect other topics from the past month are of interest to many members of Humanist list as well...

This discussion is not ideally threaded, but you can read the responses here if you scroll down to the bottom of the page, beginning with Matías Guzmán Naranjo's question:

http://mailman.uib.no/public/corpora/2014-January/subject.html#start

---
Heather Froehlich
PhD Student
University of Strathclyde
e: heather.froehlich at strath.ac.uk
w: http://hfroehlich.wordpress.com
t: @heatherfro





More information about the Humanist mailing list