[Humanist] 26.307 Humanist's scope?

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Fri Sep 14 07:49:58 CEST 2012


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 26, No. 307.
            Department of Digital Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:46:58 +0100
        From: Willard McCarty <willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk>
        Subject: a question about Humanist's scope

Dear colleagues,

As computing extends ever more into all corners of academic and social 
life, and as the digital humanities grows, diversifies and consolidates, 
it's no surprise that from time to time we should wonder about what 
appears here. I'd like to have your advice on that.

Today's posting of events is a good example: one undoubtedly relevant 
item on libraries; one on dynamical knowledge representation; one on 
computational intelligence in health monitoring. A case could be made 
for the diminishing relevance of these items, in the order I have listed 
them. I can imagine someone arguing that a reader of Humanist would get 
the wrong impression of, say, dynamical KR from just this one item, that 
he or she would be better off going to a place where KR is the main 
topic. And health informatics? The bridge to that topic, someone might 
say, is tenuous indeed. Let's specialise.

What do you think?

Yours,
WM
-- 
Willard McCarty, FRAI / Professor of Humanities Computing & Director of
the Doctoral Programme, Department of Digital Humanities, King's College
London; Professor, School of Computing, Engineering and Mathematics,
University of Western Sydney; Editor, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews
(www.isr-journal.org); Editor, Humanist
(www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/); www.mccarty.org.uk/





More information about the Humanist mailing list