[Humanist] 24.305 getting involved
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Wed Sep 1 22:23:03 CEST 2010
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 24, No. 305.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:10:16 -0400
From: James Rovira <jamesrovira at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 24.302 getting involved
In-Reply-To: <20100831235533.8D10266D48 at woodward.joyent.us>
Thanks for the response, but is that really a counterexample? Primary
competence in computer science (Ph.D.), secondary competence in
>> I wish that I could challenge your assumptions and experience, but...
>> a computer scientist who reads enough of the right books can become a
>> good enough humanist in a much shorter time than a humanist can become
>> an equally competent programmer.
> There are some important counterexamples out there. I've run across a
> fair number of PhDs in Computer Science who have a BA in Classics. One
> concentration seems to be in Massachusetts -- with UMass (CS), Tufts,
> and Harvard.
More information about the Humanist