[Humanist] 22.736 controlled vocabularies

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Wed May 6 07:56:34 CEST 2009

                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 736.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org

        Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
        From: txt at craigbellamy.net
        Subject: Re: [Humanist]  22.730 controlled vocabularies
        In-Reply-To: <20090503061914.6ACB85027 at woodward.joyent.us>

Hi John,

By 'controlled vocabulary' if you mean descriptive meta-data, then the
answer is yes it is widely used within institutional repositories (ie.
Dublin Core).

Another type of controlled vocabulary is a methods taxonomy that we have
developed and used for this project.


Also, you may with to look at the work from the repository support



Craig Bellamy

> On 2009-05-02, at 01:04 , Humanist Discussion Group wrote:
>> I'm trying to ascertain the existence of specific controlled
>> vocabularies in
>> the humanities and social sciences (and/or fields therein).  I'm
>> particularly interested in those used with institutional
>> repositories, if
>> they exist.  If you know of controlled vocabularies that are widely
>> accepted
>> and used in the relevant fields outside of IRs (in journals, for
>> example),
>> I'd appreciate pointers to those too.
> Folklorists have something like this with the Ethnographic Thesaurus.
> You can find it on the website of the American Folklore Society:
> http://et.afsnet.org/
> --
> John Laudun
> Department of English
> University of Louisiana – Lafayette
> Lafayette, LA 70504-4691
> 337-482-5493
> laudun at louisiana.edu
> http://johnlaudun.org/
> ResearcherID: A-5742-2009
> Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: johnlaudun

More information about the Humanist mailing list