[Humanist] 22.736 controlled vocabularies
Humanist Discussion Group
willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Wed May 6 07:56:34 CEST 2009
Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 736.
Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: txt at craigbellamy.net
Subject: Re: [Humanist] 22.730 controlled vocabularies
In-Reply-To: <20090503061914.6ACB85027 at woodward.joyent.us>
By 'controlled vocabulary' if you mean descriptive meta-data, then the
answer is yes it is widely used within institutional repositories (ie.
Another type of controlled vocabulary is a methods taxonomy that we have
developed and used for this project.
Also, you may with to look at the work from the repository support
> On 2009-05-02, at 01:04 , Humanist Discussion Group wrote:
>> I'm trying to ascertain the existence of specific controlled
>> vocabularies in
>> the humanities and social sciences (and/or fields therein). I'm
>> particularly interested in those used with institutional
>> repositories, if
>> they exist. If you know of controlled vocabularies that are widely
>> and used in the relevant fields outside of IRs (in journals, for
>> I'd appreciate pointers to those too.
> Folklorists have something like this with the Ethnographic Thesaurus.
> You can find it on the website of the American Folklore Society:
> John Laudun
> Department of English
> University of Louisiana â Lafayette
> Lafayette, LA 70504-4691
> laudun at louisiana.edu
> ResearcherID: A-5742-2009
> Twitter/Facebook/Flickr: johnlaudun
More information about the Humanist