[Humanist] 22.477 rude words online

Humanist Discussion Group willard.mccarty at mccarty.org.uk
Mon Jan 26 09:01:57 CET 2009


                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 477.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org



        Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:00:03 +1300
        From: Siobhan King <Siobhan.King at oag.govt.nz>
        Subject: RE: [Humanist] 22.471 rude words online?
        In-Reply-To: <20090123063510.6FBEF2C56C at woodward.joyent.us>


The simplest way is to make the words into images so web marshal can't parse them. That is how "TV go home" gets around Web Marshal. http://www.tvgohome.com/ (NSFW - coarse language)

Siobhan King
x6092
-----Original Message-----
From: humanist-bounces at lists.digitalhumanities.org [mailto:humanist-bounces at lists.digitalhumanities.org] On Behalf Of Humanist Discussion Group
Sent: Friday, 23 January 2009 7:35 p.m.
To: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org

                 Humanist Discussion Group, Vol. 22, No. 471.
         Centre for Computing in the Humanities, King's College London
                       www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist
                Submit to: humanist at lists.digitalhumanities.org

        Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:10:13 +0000
        From: Alun Edwards <alun.edwards at oucs.ox.ac.uk>
        Subject: rude words

Our dept has received an enquiry from an academic that wishes to put up
some web pages that feature rude words (with good academic reason, of
course).

The question is, does anyone know of any techniques that would avoid
having this page tagged as 'bad' content (or even porn) by search
engines, parental controls etc.?

Is substituting asterisks for vowels an effective method, or is this
likely to be worse? Are there any meta tags to put in the head that
might help?

There was also some concern that such pages would contravene a
University's regulations. However if there is a valid academic purpose
behind the use of potential offensive language then I don't think
there's any question of that.

Any thought's on the subject would be most appreciated, but remember:
keep it clean people...

Regards, Ally

--
Alun Edwards
alun.edwards at oucs.ox.ac.uk

Intute: Arts and Humanities, Oxford University Computing Services,
University of Oxford
http://www.intute.ac.uk/artsandhumanities/

First World War Poetry Digital Archive, English Faculty, University of
Oxford
http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ww1lit



More information about the Humanist mailing list